🔗 Share this article

Through a unattributed decision, the U.S. Supreme Court permitted Texas to employ a redrawn congressional district plan that is projected to include as many as five new Republican-leaning districts. The 6-3 order, handed down on Thursday, upholds a request by the state to lift a federal judge's ruling that had invalidated the redistricting plan in November.

Justices' Explanation

The federal judge wrongly interjected itself into an ongoing primary campaign, creating much confusion and upsetting the delicate equilibrium in elections, the supreme court said in justifying its decision.

The federal court had previously found that Texas had likely classified voters based on their race – a act known as illegal race-based districting – when it adopted the redistricting plan. It had ordered the state to revert to the boundaries created after the 2020 census for the upcoming election.

Sharp Dissenting Opinion

In a sharply worded objection, Justice Elena Kagan criticized the majority's action. She argued that it disregarded the work of the district court, noting that its decision was written by a judge selected by ex-President Donald Trump.

Our position is above the district court, but our capability is not greater for resolving such fact-driven issues, Kagan stated in a dissent joined by Justices Sonia Sotomayor and Ketanji Brown Jackson.

The justice went on, The majority's order ensures that Texas's redistricting plan, with all its increased favoritism, will dictate next year's elections. And it means that many Texas citizens, without justification, will be sorted in electoral districts because of their race. And that result, as this court has stated consistently, is a breach of the law of the land.

National Redistricting Battle

The court's action is part of a national fight over the remapping of electoral maps. Texas is a key piece in pushes to alter the U.S. House map to secure a fragile Republican hold. Ordinarily, redistricting takes place after a new decade's census. Yet the move by Texas Republicans to initiate a aggressive mid-cycle redistricting earlier this year triggered a wave among other states.

Conservative legislators in including North Carolina and Missouri have also passed redistricting plans that are estimated to yield a number of additional Republican-leaning seats. Democrats, for their part, have responded with revised boundaries in states like California and Virginia, which could offset those projected gains.

Political Reactions

The Texas top lawyer praised the supreme court ruling. In a comment, he said the order defended Texas's prerogative to draw a map that ensures electoral outcomes supportive of Republicans. Texas is paving the way as we take our country back, district by district, state by state, he stated.

In contrast, Democratic representatives criticized the decision. It's incredibly disappointing that the Court has rubber stamped a map enacted by Texas Republicans which, simply put, is an extreme, racially gerrymandered map, said the head of a major Democratic campaign committee.

Another senior Democratic leader stated the court had once again damaged its standing by rubber-stamping a racially gerrymandered map. Tonight's ruling by far-right justices on the supreme court is further proof that the extremists will do anything to rig the midterm elections. The gerrymandered Texas congressional map is a partisan and racially discriminatory power grab designed to subvert the will of the voters – particularly in Black and Latino communities, he concluded.